Analysis of Language Essay

distinguish in published by Internet blogger Voxi is a persuasive denomination regarding the technological boom being experienced by not only todays younker but by society in general. Published on May 23, 2009 on website Ctrl Alt Keyed in Voxi, contends that society and its members should herald the implementation of new engineering and welcome it with open arms, contrasting the profits with great historical discoveries such as Darwinism and the reorganisation of the cosmos. The title itself has a double meaning, the first and nearly obvious of which is the literal keyboard associated with technology and the second refers to those who atomic number 18 keyed in to an ever-changing society and involuntary to move with it as opposed to be left behind. The article begins with a non-confrontational promissory note however throughout Voxi begins to show a more compelling tone. Accompanying Voxis article is a picture of a human head withholding a microchip that projects multiple la yers, the main point of this is to make the referee think about how technology has been embedded into the core of society and implemented into every layer of the domain today. Voxis contention is pro digital technology and is this is strategically withheld until the 5th paragraph so that readers depart read on, curious of the generators contentionVoxi continuously simplifies and exemplifies his arguments through metaphoric language, allowing for readers to fully comprehend his opinion whilst addressing the supernumerary attention required. By contrasting citizenry who embrace technology with the grit of an oyster, readers ar ab initio made to regard individuals who accept change as stubborn, unwanted members of society. However Voxi diverts this analogy, positively presenting these gritty people by explaining how oysters produce pearls. Readers argon allowed to distinguish the relationship between the beauty of pearls, with the accomplishments of those who wish to make thing s wagerer, evoking gratitude towards these individuals who ask questions. Through the inclusion of television series The Inventors, Voxi aims his opinion piece towards those who enjoy witnessing the progression of technology into exciting ventures. By correlating the gritty people with individuals who eventually enter the show, Voxi aspires to present readers with members ofsociety who wish to ameliorate quality of life. As readers witness the potential benefits of change in their lives, they feel inclined to accept the alterations in all forms, including technology.Voxi introduces readers to the concept of beneficial change prior to his contention of digital technology being a great opportunity for humanity, as a way of creating susceptibility within readers towards accepting alterations in life. The author promotes the digital revolution through a quick succession of psychological benefits, in that humans go away solve the riddles of the universe, find cures faster and find wa ys of preserving the planet. By presenting a promising future, readers are encouraged to embrace such hope and reject the boundaries of darkness. Through using the comical stipulation homo supersapien, Voxi introduces readers to a more relaxed aspect of his opinion piece, using a less eccentric tone to formulate the possibility of an advanced race of humans. The writer further explains how this superior human species will be capable of ending war and violence, exciting readers to the prospect of realism peace. By expressing an aspect of world culture wished by all members of society, Voxi instruments his argument to appeal to readers humanity.However Voxi also notes to embarrass the flaws in his argument, through the inclusion of a podcast which consist of the negative attributes associated with technology, such as the digital world is a worldwhere nothing has meaning. The podcast itself is efficient through repetitive language in a world so as to emphasise the significance of t echnology on society. By demonstrating that he is frank towards the subject, the writer positions readers to be more accepting of his contention as they are exposed to both aspects of the debate, and so are allowed to establish an opinion on the issue themselves. By revealing both facets of the dilemma, Voxi gains readers trust as they are not mislead or withheld from information.The fear of privacy invasion is also addressed, in that Voxi offers relatively simple solutions to an initially complex problem. As a major concern in the development of technology is privacy issues, Voxi explains how you can protest and get them removed if worried. By confronting theissue and proposing an answer readers trust in the writer is reinforced, as he has for the second time confronted a flaw in his argument. Voxi capitalises on this technique by proceeding to include the rhetorical question, why wouldnt you want it in your life?, so as to impose a one-directional response from readers who proce ed to feel pressured to comply with the writers contention. Voxi repeats this methodology when addressing the concerns of older readers, when he asks Whats there to be afraid of?. By pliable no obvious response, these individuals are inclined to consider Voxis answer and consequently accept it.The writer alters the form of writing to be more personal, by noting that hot air balloons are always looking for into my windows too. This is so as to subdue reader concerns for safety in light of technological advancements, by reminding them that he too is an ordinary member of society. By expressing his contempt attitude towards the risk involved with digital revolution, concerned readers are comforted and are less inclined to oppose the writer. Voxi later draw individuals who reject technology as losers, implementing a direct attack on people who oppose his contention. such(prenominal) action is done so as to direct readers to feel part of the majority, playing on the instinctual liking of humans to belong. The strategic placement of this assault at the conclusion of the opinion piece, infers that this last technique is aimed towards readers who are yet to comply with the writers argument.Through both inclusive and attacking language, the writer evokes accord from readers, by allowing them to relate to him and feel pressured to accept the contention. By including flaws the writer gains reader support as they are not mislead and denied information, further reinforcing the argument that the digital revolution should be embraced, and without it you wont be in touch and connected.